WriteHuman review after 2 months, is the hype justified?

Been using WriteHuman for about 2 months now so I feel like I can give a fair review.

Pros:
– Clean interface, super easy to use
– Fast processing even on longer texts
– Their “Ultra” mode does get past Turnitin most of the time
– Good customer support (they responded to my email within a day)

Cons:
– Output sometimes reads like it was written by someone whose first language is not English. Weird preposition choices.
– The free version is extremely limited
– At 2/month it is one of the more expensive options
– Inconsistent results. Some days I get 2% on Turnitin, other days 25% with very similar input text

That inconsistency is the dealbreaker for me. When you are submitting a paper you need to KNOW it will pass, not hope. I ran the same text through WriteHuman three times in a row and got different outputs each time with wildly different detection scores.

I eventually switched to Walter Writes which has been way more consistent. Every time I run something through it I get between 0-5% on Turnitin. That reliability is worth everything when your grade depends on it.

WriteHuman is not bad but the inconsistency makes it hard to recommend when better options exist.